« Snapshot 01 March 02006 | Main | A Little Friday Catertainment »

02 March 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

John B.

SB,
Along the lines of "Physics for Poets": I don't know if you listen to Writer's Almanac, but go here and read the poem for 3 February.

As for the Cosmic Variance link: that was a marvelous piece of writing. Thanks for leading me there. I especially liked the bit about the equations "to make it look like science." It reminded me of something Feynemann (sp?) once said: "We just draw arrows on chalkboards--that's all we do."

belledame222

I read that right after I read the above kitty post (squee!), and for a split second I read it as "physics for pets."

Erin

His name was Feynman, and if you really want to understand physics, try Six Easy Pieces.

Otherwise, you can do what I do ... have smart friends and bug them as needed. I would be proud to count myself in your circle ....


John B.

I am always on the lookout for smart friends. I thank you.

SB

Thanks, Erin -- I will find that book. I bet the local used book store has it. Easier than Hawking, eh?

And I will keep asking you questions.

Erin

Much easier than Hawking. I found Hawking a difficult read. Many scientits are; Feynman is an exception.

James Gleik and Timothy Ferris are two non-scientists who write splendidly on science
Also, John Gribbon's In Search of Schrödinger's Cat will also tell you all you are likely to need to know about Quantum Mechanics. I read it in HS, and didn't learn appreciably more about Quantum Mechanics in six years studying physics. Some math, is all.

The comments to this entry are closed.


  • flickr   Instagram   Pinterest
    facebook   Google+   RSS


  • sbpoet's artstream

  • Follow

  • Free Twitter buttons from languageisavirus.com

  • flickr
    Created with flickr badge.


Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin